I went to see Coraline last night (can someone explain to me why we sometimes get movies in the UK months and months after their release in the US, and yet we get other movies at the same time?). I believe with Pixar's 'UP', we will be amongst the last of the European countries to get it. It's not like any translation is required!

Anyway, back to Coraline. I donned the funky glasses to watch it in 3D and for the most part forgot I was watching a 3D film. Clearly studios are learning to avoid having too much stuff coming out to poke you in the eye. However it begs the question of whether it's worth using 3D if you forget it is there. What's the point? It's mainly this question that makes me think 3D will not catch on any more this time around than it did before. I think as soon as most cinemas have converted to the digital format, we will see a rapid decline in 3D films.
I noticed another problem when I saw 'Bolt' in 3D. It was really easy to spot flaws in the CG models that you just wouldn't notice on a flat image. One example that springs to mind is car headlights. They really looked like a texture layed onto the surface of the car, rather than a piece of glass with a space behind it containing a light.
In general, I thought Coraline had a good story and amazing animation, however it failed to deliver that spark that 'Nightmare Before Christmas' had. It felt rather like a Tim Burton film that they had forgotten to involve him in. I felt like it was lacking in imagination just a little bit. Things were creepy and surreal at times, but there wasn't really anything new there. As much as it pains me to say it, I can't imagine ever sitting through it again for any reason other than to study the fantastic animation.